1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 26 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2789 mm |