1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2011 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 310 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 2011 Aston Martin Virage | |
Make | Chevrolet | Aston Martin |
Model | Malibu | Virage |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 490 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4704 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1283 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2741 mm |