1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-V weights approximately 126 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2013 Honda CR-V is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Malibu | CR-V |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1601 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |