1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ8

To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 139 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2007 Jaguar XJ8
Make Chevrolet Jaguar
Model Monte Carlo XJ8
Year Released 1982 2007
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3790 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 294 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1545 kg 1684 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 3040 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]