1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 115 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Monte Carlo | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2909 mm |