1982 Chevrolet Monza vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Monza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Monza would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 260 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Monza.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Monza | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Monza | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2840 mm |