1982 Chevrolet Monza vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Monza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Monza would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 140 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Monza.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Monza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1982 Chevrolet Monza has manual transmission. 1982 Chevrolet Monza will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Monza | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | Monza | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |