1982 Chevrolet Monza vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Monza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Monza would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Monza is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Monza is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Monza. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Volvo V50 has automatic transmission and 1982 Chevrolet Monza has manual transmission. 1982 Chevrolet Monza will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo V50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Monza | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Monza | V50 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2345 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |