1982 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,193 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler Cordoba. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Cordoba | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Cordoba | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5193 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 283 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2890 mm |
