1982 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 2010 Mazda Premacy
To start off, 2010 Mazda Premacy is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,193 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chrysler Cordoba is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chrysler Cordoba. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Premacy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Chrysler Cordoba has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda Premacy has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda Premacy will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Chrysler Cordoba will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Cordoba | 2010 Mazda Premacy | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Cordoba | Premacy |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5193 cc | 1840 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
