1982 Chrysler E vs. 1946 Simca 5
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 5 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1946 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 646 kg more than 1946 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1946 Simca 5 | |
Make | Chrysler | Simca |
Model | E | 5 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2010 mm |