1982 Chrysler E vs. 1965 MG 1100
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1965 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1965 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 420 kg more than 1965 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1965 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Chrysler | MG |
| Model | E | 1100 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2380 mm |
