1982 Chrysler E vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 505 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1965 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | E | 8 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 955 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2280 mm |
