1982 Chrysler E vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 84 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | E | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
