1982 Chrysler E vs. 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta weights approximately 305 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta | |
Make | Chrysler | De Tomaso |
Model | E | Mangusta |
Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |