1982 Chrysler E vs. 1968 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 4 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1968 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Chrysler | NSU |
Model | E | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2870 mm |