1982 Chrysler E vs. 1970 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 246 kg more than 1970 Ford GT 40.
Because 1970 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1970 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2420 mm |