1982 Chrysler E vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (95 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | E | 140 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 95 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |