1982 Chrysler E vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | E | 66 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |