1982 Chrysler E vs. 1981 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ronda. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 256 kg more than 1981 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ronda. (98 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1981 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Chrysler | Seat |
Model | E | Ronda |
Year Released | 1982 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2460 mm |