1982 Chrysler E vs. 1984 Renault 25
To start off, 1984 Renault 25 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Renault 25 (123 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Renault 25 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 6 kg more than 1984 Renault 25.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Renault 25 (182 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Renault 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1984 Renault 25 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | E | 25 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2730 mm |
