1982 Chrysler E vs. 1985 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1985 Mercury Cougar is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 274 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 1985 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1985 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | E | Cougar |
Year Released | 1982 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |