1982 Chrysler E vs. 1988 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1988 Ford Tempo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 95 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1988 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | Tempo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |