1982 Chrysler E vs. 1989 Mazda 626
To start off, 1989 Mazda 626 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 86 kg more than 1989 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 626. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1989 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | E | 626 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |