1982 Chrysler E vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (91 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 301 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (141 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | E | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |