1982 Chrysler E vs. 1991 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1991 Ford Tempo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 56 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1991 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | Tempo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2305 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |