1982 Chrysler E vs. 1994 Holden Nova
To start off, 1994 Holden Nova is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 230 kg more than 1994 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1994 Holden Nova | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | E | Nova |
Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2440 mm |