1982 Chrysler E vs. 1994 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 1994 Lancia Kappa is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Kappa (205 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 274 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Kappa (299 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1994 Lancia Kappa | |
Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
Model | E | Kappa |
Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 299 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |