1982 Chrysler E vs. 1994 Nissan Presea
To start off, 1994 Nissan Presea is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 93 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 216 kg more than 1994 Nissan Presea.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Nissan Presea. (125 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Nissan Presea.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1994 Nissan Presea | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | E | Presea |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
