1982 Chrysler E vs. 1995 Daewoo Brougham
To start off, 1995 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo Brougham (108 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Brougham should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 94 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Daewoo Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Daewoo Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1995 Daewoo Brougham | |
| Make | Chrysler | Daewoo |
| Model | E | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |
