1982 Chrysler E vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 238 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |