1982 Chrysler E vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 4 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | E | 626 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |
