1982 Chrysler E vs. 1995 Renault Safrane
To start off, 1995 Renault Safrane is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,434 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 Renault Safrane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Renault Safrane (162 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Renault Safrane should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Renault Safrane weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Renault Safrane. (211 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Renault Safrane.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1995 Renault Safrane | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | E | Safrane |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2434 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |