1982 Chrysler E vs. 1996 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 257 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 139 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.

Compare all specifications: