1982 Chrysler E vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 40 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | E | 626 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |
