1982 Chrysler E vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 145 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | E | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2350 mm |