1982 Chrysler E vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 180 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | E | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1026 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
