1982 Chrysler E vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (200 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1997 Acura TL | |
| Make | Chrysler | Acura |
| Model | E | TL |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2840 mm |
