1982 Chrysler E vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 358 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | E | C2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 284 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2240 mm |