1982 Chrysler E vs. 1998 Rover 400
To start off, 1998 Rover 400 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1998 Rover 400 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | E | 400 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2560 mm |