1982 Chrysler E vs. 1999 Holden Nova
To start off, 1999 Holden Nova is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 116 kg more than 1999 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1999 Holden Nova | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | E | Nova |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2470 mm |