1982 Chrysler E vs. 1999 Honda HR-V
To start off, 1999 Honda HR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1999 Honda HR-V. (113 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda HR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 125 kg more than 1999 Honda HR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda HR-V. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1999 Honda HR-V | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | E | HR-V |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1672 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2360 mm |