1982 Chrysler E vs. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | E | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4554 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2550 mm |
