1982 Chrysler E vs. 1999 Opel Meriva
To start off, 1999 Opel Meriva is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Opel Meriva (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Meriva weights approximately 174 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Opel Meriva (223 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1999 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Chrysler | Opel |
Model | E | Meriva |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1686 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |