1982 Chrysler E vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (226 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 304 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 (275 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
Make | Chrysler | Alfa Romeo |
Model | E | 166 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 275 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |