1982 Chrysler E vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
Model | E | ESX 3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 332 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3000 mm |