1982 Chrysler E vs. 2000 Hyundai XG
To start off, 2000 Hyundai XG is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,493 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Hyundai XG is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Hyundai XG (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Hyundai XG should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Hyundai XG weights approximately 315 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hyundai XG (230 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Hyundai XG will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2000 Hyundai XG | |
Make | Chrysler | Hyundai |
Model | E | XG |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |