1982 Chrysler E vs. 2000 Kia Retona
To start off, 2000 Kia Retona is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2000 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Retona weights approximately 625 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2000 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Retona. (205 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Retona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2000 Kia Retona | |
| Make | Chrysler | Kia |
| Model | E | Retona |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2370 mm |
