1982 Chrysler E vs. 2000 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 607 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,230 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 607 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot 607 (160 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Peugeot 607 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Peugeot 607. (217 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Peugeot 607.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2000 Peugeot 607 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Peugeot |
| Model | E | 607 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2810 mm |
