1982 Chrysler E vs. 2001 Honda Fit
To start off, 2001 Honda Fit is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Honda Fit. (85 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 216 kg more than 2001 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Fit. (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2001 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | E | Fit |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1339 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2460 mm |
